Özet

Dental implantoloji her geçen gün gelişmektedir. Dental implantların operasyon gününde yüklenmesi sayesinde fonksiyon ve estetik hemen rehabilite edilebilmektedir. Tam dişsiz hastalarda posterior bölgede vertikal ve horizontal açıdan yeterli kemik bulunmadığı durumlarda posteriorda açılı, anteriorda ise düz yerleştirilmiş implantlar üzerine yapılan sabit protez operasyon gününde hastaya teslim edilebilmektedir. Bu sayede başarı şansı düşük ileri cerrahi yöntemlerden, kısa implant kullanımından kaçınılabilmektedir. Bu vaka sunumunda, periodontal sağlığını kaybetmesi sebebiyle alt çenesinde mevcut dişlerinin çekimi planlanan bir hastanın, posterior bölgesinde yeterli kemik hacmi mevcut olmadığından anterior bölgeye ikisi açılı ikisi ise düz olarak yerleştirilen dört implant üzerine hemen yükleme yapılarak vidalanan geçici sabit protezi sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Quattrofix Konsepti, Hemen Yükleme, Dental İmplant, Geçici Sabit Protez.

---

Abstract

Dental implantology is developing every year. The immediate loading of dental implants, allows restoring the function and aesthetic in the surgical operation day. When the posterior bone volume is insufficient vertically or horizontally in the posterior regions, the concept of inserting angulated, implants in the posterior and straight implants in the anterior region provides an opportunity for immediate loading of four implants, with fixed prosthesis. Thus, advanced surgeries with low success rates and usage of short dental implants can be avoided. In this case report, the fixed prosthesis that was screwed on four dental implants placed in the anterior region in accordance with this concept was presented.

Keywords

Quattrofix Concept, Immediate Loading, Dental Implant, Temporary Fixed Prosthesis.

---

Referanslar | References

1. Branemark PI. Vital microscopy of bone marrow in rabbit. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1959; 11 Supp 38: 1-82.
2. Küçükkurt S, Konjenital bir oligodonti vakasının all-on-4 dental implant konsepti ile tedavisi, Aydın Dental Journal, 2019.
3. Ratiu CA, Porumb A, Ciavoi G, Immediate loading all on 4- all on 6 in total maxillary edentulous, International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports, 2020, 4(7):50-54.
4. Ben Hadj Hassine M, Bucci P, Gasparro R, Di Lauro AE, Sammartino G. Safe approach in "All-on-four" technique: a case report. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2015 Feb 9;5(4):142-5.
5. Sorní M, Guarinós J, García O, Peñarrocha M. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: a review of the literature since 1999. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10(Suppl 1):E45–56
6. Soto-Penaloza D, Zaragozi-Alonso R, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Diago M. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: e474-e488.
7. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate- function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5 (1):2-9.
8. Testori F, Galli M, del Fabro M., Immediate loading -A New Era in Oral Implantology, Quintessence Publishing 2011, 9-51.
9. Lopes A, Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Sanchez- Fernandez E. The NobelGuide(R) All-on-4(R) Treatment Concept for Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: A Prospective Report on Medium- and Long- Term Outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17 (2):406-16.
10. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142(3):310 20.
11. Tallarico M, Canullo L, Pisano M, et al. An up to 7- Year Retrospective Analysis of Biologic and Technical Complication With the All-on-4 Concept. J Oral Implantol 2016;42(3):265-71.
12. Ayna M, Gülses A, Acil Y. A comparative study on 7-year results of “All-on-FourTM” immediate- function concept for completely edentulous mandibles: metal-ceramic vs. bar-retained superstructures. Odontology 2018;106(1):73-82.
13.  Francetti L, Corbella S, Taschieri S, Cavalli N, Del Fabbro M. Medium- and Long-Term Complications in Full-Arch Rehabilitations Supported by Upright and Tilted Implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:758–64. 
14. Patzelt SBM, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR, The All-on-Four treatment concept: A systematic review, Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res, 2014, 16(6):836-55
15. Tsigarida A, Chochlidakis K, A comparison between fixed and removable mandibular implant supported full arch prostheses: An overview of systematic reviews. Int J. Prosthodont. 2021:34:85-92.
16. Taruna M, Chittaranjan B, Sudheer N, Tella S, Abusaad MD, Prosthodontic pespective to All-On-4 concept for dental implants, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2014;8(10):16-19.
17. Türker N, Alkiş HT, Sadowsky SJ, Büyükkaplan ŞU, Effects of occlusal scheme on All-On-4 abutments, screws and prostheses: A three dimensional finite element study. J. Oral Implantol. 2021:47(1):18-24.
18. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler MS, Bernard JP, Samson J, Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2004;15:520-528.
19.  Di P, Lin Y, Li JH, Luo J, Qiu LX, Chen B. The All-on-Four implant therapy protocol in the management of edentulous Chinese patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:509–16.
20.  Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:149–70.